Skip navigation
  1. Home
  2. Fracking in WA
  3. Fracking Gasfield Risks

Fracking Gasfield Risks

In Western Australia the majority of unconventional gas is found in shale beds and tight sandstone rock strata, unlike Eastern Australia where most unconventional gas deposits are found in coal seams.

 

Shale and tight gasfields involve the industrialisation of entire landscapes with numerous closely spaced wells. Typical gasfields contain thousands of wells. Gasfields also require vast networks of access roads, gas pipelines, processing plants, compressor stations, and wastewater holding dams and treatment plants.

Tight Sandstone oil and gas field in Wyoming USA

What is Fracking?

Techniques such as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) are needed to extract commercial quantities of shale and tight gas and oil. Fracking involves pumping large volumes of water, chemicals and sand (or other ‘proppants’) into the ground to increase gas or oil flow.

Image Source: Greenpeace USA

Tight gas also requires acidation, which involves pumping acids into the well to dissolve the cements between rock grains, and the industry are developing new invasive techniques to extract tight gas, as fracking doesn't always work.

What are the impacts?

Fracking is an extremely water-intensive practice: A single shale gas frack uses 11-34 million litres of water. That’s roughly 360 – 1100 truckloads. Wells are often fracked on multiple occasions, sometimes dozens of times, multiplying overall water use. The large amount of water used in fracking would put severe pressure on Western Australia's precious underground water resources, which are relied upon by communities and industries across the state.

Chemical use in unconventional gas and fracking: A wide range of chemicals are used in fracking and unconventional gas development. Whilst the industry maintains that ‘most’ of these chemicals are found in household products[1], fracking compounds used in Australia have been shown to include many hazardous substances, including carcinogens, neurotoxins, irritants/sensitisers, reproductive toxins and endocrine disruptors[2]. Many of the chemicals used in fracking have never been assessed for their long-term impacts on the environment and human health.

Issues with unconventional gasfield wastewater disposal: Large volumes of toxic waste water are produced in fracking operations with 15-80% of this waste returning to the surface and being stored in holding dams. This wastewater contains drilling and fracking chemicals and other substances present in the source rocks. These contaminants include heavy metals, radioactive materials, volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) and high concentrations of salts.

Buru Energy fracking wastewater holding pond in the Kimberley

Fracking operations for unconventional oil in Argentina

Fracking waste water is usually disposed of through reinjection into aquifer formations, held in holding ponds for storage/evaporation, or partially ‘treated’ and reused or released into waterways. Leaking ponds, flood events or accidents during transportation can lead to contamination of local waterways and aquifers, threatening wildlife, agriculture and human health.

Kimberley frack site incidents: To date, only three wells have been fracked in the Kimberley but already significant issues have occurred. Community members found Buru Energy’s Yulleroo 2 well was leaking greenhouse gases. It was later revealed that this well hadn’t been inspected by any government department for seven years, from when it was drilled until the second leak was reported in 2015. At the Asgard well site near the Fitzroy River,wastewater from the well was found to be radioactive.

 

Serious health consequences: Unconventional gasfields pollute the air with a range of toxic gases and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC's). There is a growing body of research from overseas that highlights the impacts of dangerous air pollutants on human health in communities living in close proximity to fracking and unconventional gas operations. Communities living near gasfields in the US have reported serious health effects following the commencement of unconventional gas operations, including respiratory ailments, nose, throat and eye irritations, and neurological illnesses[3].

Read more about these and other fracking impacts on our fully referenced fact sheet.

[1] APPEA: The Natural Gas Revolution- Natural gas from shale and tight rocks.

[2] National Toxics Network: Toxic Chemicals in the Exploration and Production of Gas from Unconventional Sources.

[3] National Toxics Network: Toxic Chemicals in the Exploration and Production of Gas from Unconventional Sources.

Ban fracking in the Kimberley- before it’s too late

Western Australia’s iconic Kimberley region is under threat from fracking!

Communities, culture and natural wonders are all at risk from oil and gas developments.

We can't let them destroy this iconic place! Add your voice to the call for a fracking ban.

 

Premier Cook - the Kimberley is too precious to open up to fracking oil & gasfields. Fracking puts the Kimberley’s environmental diversity and cultures at risk.

Don’t leave people in a sacrifice zone. If fracking is too risky for the people of the South West, Perth and Peel regions where it’s banned, it’s too risky for the Kimberley and the rest of WA too.

We call on you to ban fracking in the Kimberley.

5,000 Signatures

3,452 Signatures

Will you sign?